Soviet Union vs Sri Lankan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Sri Lankan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Sri Lankans
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Sri Lankan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,487,843 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,321,822 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 1.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 10.8% | 20.4% |
| Range | 8.2% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 6.2% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Sri Lankans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Ugandan (5.7%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Peruvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Sierra Leonean (5.7%, a difference of 0.67%), Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.75%), Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |