Pima vs Subsaharan African Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Pima
Subsaharan African
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Pima
Sub-Saharan Africans
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Subsaharan African Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,479,662 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 27.7%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 8.6% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 44.5% | 52.4% |
Range | 35.9% | 50.2% |
Mean | 19.9% | 16.8% |
Median | 18.9% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.1% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 10.7% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are White/Caucasian (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Dominica (12.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Spanish (12.7%, a difference of 0.28%), French (12.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Marshallese (12.5%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
German Russians | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.5% |
Malaysians | 0.5 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.5% |
Senegalese | 0.5 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.5% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.4 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.4 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.5% |
Marshallese | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.7% |
Spanish | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 12.7% |
French | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 12.7% |
Nepalese | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 12.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 12.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 12.8% |
Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 12.9% |