Pima vs Icelander Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Pima
Icelander
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Pima
Icelanders
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
39.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Icelander Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,603,880 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.134 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 42.0%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Icelander |
| Minimum | 8.6% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 44.5% | 34.9% |
| Range | 35.9% | 31.9% |
| Mean | 19.9% | 12.6% |
| Median | 18.9% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.1% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 6.3% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Oceania (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Barbados (11.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (11.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Czechs | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 11.3% |
| Ugandans | 43.7 /100 | #176 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 42.2 /100 | #177 | Average 11.3% |
| Poles | 42.0 /100 | #178 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 41.6 /100 | #179 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 41.5 /100 | #180 | Average 11.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 40.8 /100 | #181 | Average 11.4% |
| Icelanders | 39.7 /100 | #182 | Fair 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 39.5 /100 | #183 | Fair 11.4% |
| Kenyans | 39.2 /100 | #184 | Fair 11.4% |
| Danes | 36.8 /100 | #185 | Fair 11.4% |
| Slovenes | 36.6 /100 | #186 | Fair 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 35.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 11.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 34.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 11.4% |
| Hungarians | 34.6 /100 | #189 | Fair 11.4% |