Pima vs Puerto Rican Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Pima
Puerto Rican
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Pima
Puerto Ricans
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Puerto Rican Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,542,220 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Puerto Rican |
Minimum | 8.6% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 44.5% | 41.5% |
Range | 35.9% | 39.2% |
Mean | 19.9% | 18.3% |
Median | 18.9% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.1% | 21.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Puerto Ricans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puerto Ricans are Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 0.55%), Colville (15.8%, a difference of 0.66%), Yuman (15.8%, a difference of 0.85%), and Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |