Pima vs Immigrants from England Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from England
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from England
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
77.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Immigrants from England Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,702,144 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 46.8%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Immigrants from England |
Minimum | 8.6% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 44.5% | 63.6% |
Range | 35.9% | 61.6% |
Mean | 19.9% | 16.0% |
Median | 18.9% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.1% | 15.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 13.4% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Ukrainian (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Canada (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Moroccan (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (11.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and New Zealander (11.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 83.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 10.9% |
Arabs | 82.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 81.1 /100 | #149 | Excellent 10.9% |
Syrians | 79.8 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
New Zealanders | 79.3 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Ukrainians | 78.0 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | England | 77.4 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Canada | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Moroccans | 76.4 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 76.2 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Guyanese | 75.1 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | North America | 74.9 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
Serbians | 73.6 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Croatians | 73.1 /100 | #160 | Good 11.0% |