Pima vs Sioux Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Pima
Sioux
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Pima
Sioux
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Sioux Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,536,530 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,128,884 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.296 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 2.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Sioux |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.37% |
| Maximum | 13.0% | 17.9% |
| Range | 12.0% | 17.5% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 4.5% |
| Median | 4.7% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Sioux by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Welsh (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and German (3.7%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Delaware (3.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Micronesia (3.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Spanish (3.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Blackfeet (3.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and Swedish (3.6%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |