Pima vs Scottish Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Pima
Scottish
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Pima
Scottish
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Scottish Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,536,530 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,483,062 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 0.60%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Scottish |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.87% |
Maximum | 13.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 12.0% | 99.1% |
Mean | 5.4% | 12.6% |
Median | 4.7% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Scottish by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Welsh (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and German (3.7%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Pennsylvania German (3.7%, a difference of 0.030%), German (3.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Dutch (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Menominee (3.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |
Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.7% |
French | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 3.8% |
English | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 3.8% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 3.8% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 3.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 3.8% |