Ute vs Sioux Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Ute
Sioux
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Ute
Sioux
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Sioux Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,656,713 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.134 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,128,884 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.296 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 4.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Sioux |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.37% |
| Maximum | 10.9% | 17.9% |
| Range | 9.3% | 17.5% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 4.5% |
| Median | 4.8% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Sioux by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Spaniard (3.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Canadian (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), European (3.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Delaware (3.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Micronesia (3.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Spanish (3.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Blackfeet (3.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and Swedish (3.6%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |