Pima vs English Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Pima
English
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Pima
English
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs English Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,536,530 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,898,364 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of English and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 3.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | English |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 13.0% | 33.9% |
Range | 12.0% | 32.9% |
Mean | 5.4% | 6.8% |
Median | 4.7% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 8.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and English by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Welsh (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and German (3.7%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to English are French (3.8%, a difference of 0.57%), Marshallese (3.8%, a difference of 0.86%), Menominee (3.7%, a difference of 0.87%), Dutch (3.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and French Canadian (3.8%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |
Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.7% |
French | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 3.8% |
English | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 3.8% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 3.8% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 3.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 3.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 3.8% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 3.8% |