Mexican American Indian vs Guatemalan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Guatemalan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Guatemalans
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
30.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Guatemalan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,517,841 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,382,771 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Guatemalan |
| Minimum | 0.46% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 19.4% | 13.2% |
| Range | 18.9% | 11.9% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 6.4% |
| Median | 6.8% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and Guatemalans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |