Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Immigrants
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Immigrants
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,357,808 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,108,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 20.4% | 20.4% |
Range | 18.1% | 18.8% |
Mean | 6.3% | 6.1% |
Median | 5.9% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.89% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |