Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Ute Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Ute
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Ute
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Ute Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,357,808 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,207 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Ute |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 20.4% | 26.5% |
Range | 18.1% | 24.8% |
Mean | 6.3% | 7.6% |
Median | 5.9% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ute by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |