Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Danish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Danish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Danes
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Danish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,357,808 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,952,893 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.92%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Danish |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 20.4% | 51.6% |
Range | 18.1% | 50.4% |
Mean | 6.3% | 7.5% |
Median | 5.9% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Danes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |