Immigrants from South Africa vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Immigrants from Belarus
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Immigrants from Belarus
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,268,950 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.763 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,188,321 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 6.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Immigrants from Belarus |
Minimum | 0.47% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 27.3% | 19.6% |
Range | 26.8% | 19.0% |
Mean | 7.8% | 6.2% |
Median | 6.6% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |