Immigrants from South Africa vs Soviet Union Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Soviet Union
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Soviet Union
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Soviet Union Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,268,950 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.763 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,487,843 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.76%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Soviet Union |
Minimum | 0.47% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 27.3% | 10.8% |
Range | 26.8% | 8.2% |
Mean | 7.8% | 5.3% |
Median | 6.6% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Soviet Union by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |