Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Russia
Immigrants from Belarus
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Russia
Immigrants from Belarus
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,844,445 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,188,321 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 2.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Russia | Immigrants from Belarus |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 15.9% | 19.6% |
Range | 14.8% | 19.0% |
Mean | 6.6% | 6.2% |
Median | 5.6% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Russia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Russia are Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |