Immigrants from Russia vs Swedish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Russia
Swedish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Russia
Swedes
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Russia vs Swedish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,844,445 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,852,545 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Russia | Swedish |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.84% |
Maximum | 15.9% | 47.7% |
Range | 14.8% | 46.9% |
Mean | 6.6% | 9.9% |
Median | 5.6% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Russia and Swedes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Russia are Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |