Immigrants from Syria vs Swedish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Syria
Swedish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Syria
Swedes
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Syria vs Swedish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,106,838 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,852,545 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.10%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Syria | Swedish |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.84% |
Maximum | 14.1% | 47.7% |
Range | 12.1% | 46.9% |
Mean | 6.3% | 9.9% |
Median | 6.0% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Syria and Swedes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Syria are Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |