Icelander vs Swedish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Icelander
Swedish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Icelanders
Swedes
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Swedish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,642,692 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,852,545 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | Swedish |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 0.84% |
| Maximum | 16.5% | 47.7% |
| Range | 16.1% | 46.9% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 9.9% |
| Median | 5.6% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Swedes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |