Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Poland
Immigrants from Jordan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Poland
Immigrants from Jordan
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
70.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,813,024 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,270,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Poland | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 0.95% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 20.5% | 6.7% |
Range | 19.6% | 6.3% |
Mean | 4.7% | 2.9% |
Median | 3.0% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.92% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 0.99% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 0.98% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Jordan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Laotian (2.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (2.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |