Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Costa Rican Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Costa Rican
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Costa Ricans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
69.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
71.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Costa Rican Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,316,169 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,538,538 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.22%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.86% |
Maximum | 4.4% | 9.0% |
Range | 2.7% | 8.2% |
Mean | 3.0% | 3.3% |
Median | 2.9% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.60% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.56% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.56% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Costa Ricans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |