Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Czech Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Czech
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Czechs
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Czech Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,691,189 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,584,263 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Czech |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 22.3% | 32.8% |
Range | 19.7% | 31.6% |
Mean | 6.4% | 7.7% |
Median | 5.7% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.93% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Czechs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |