Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Estonian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Estonian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Estonians
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Estonian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,691,189 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,516,931 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.13%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Estonian |
Minimum | 2.5% | 0.64% |
Maximum | 22.3% | 24.6% |
Range | 19.7% | 24.0% |
Mean | 6.4% | 7.0% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 8.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.93% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Estonians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |