Immigrants from Italy vs Czech Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Czech
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Czechs
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
85.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Czech Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,167,823 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.268 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,584,263 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.17%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Czech |
Minimum | 0.65% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 32.8% |
Range | 13.4% | 31.6% |
Mean | 6.5% | 7.7% |
Median | 5.9% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 7.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and Czechs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |