Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Arab Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Arab
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Arabs
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Arab Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,691,189 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,612,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.14%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Arab |
Minimum | 2.5% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 22.3% | 17.8% |
Range | 19.7% | 15.3% |
Mean | 6.4% | 7.0% |
Median | 5.7% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.93% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Arabs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |