Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Arab Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Arab
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Arabs
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
89.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Arab Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,443,278 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,612,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.28%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Kazakhstan | Arab |
Minimum | 0.25% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 20.1% | 17.8% |
Range | 19.9% | 15.3% |
Mean | 6.9% | 7.0% |
Median | 6.2% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Arabs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |