Immigrants from Ghana vs Italian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Italian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Italians
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
41.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
22.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Italian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,872,719 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,457,060 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Italian |
| Minimum | 0.61% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 16.2% | 31.5% |
| Range | 15.6% | 29.8% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 6.7% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana and Italians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and European (6.2%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |