Immigrants from Ghana vs Swiss Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Swiss
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Swiss
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
41.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
43.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Swiss Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,872,719 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,822,088 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.10%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Swiss |
| Minimum | 0.61% | 0.81% |
| Maximum | 16.2% | 26.5% |
| Range | 15.6% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 7.5% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana and Swiss by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |