Immigrants from Ghana vs Ecuadorian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Ecuadorian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Ecuadorians
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
41.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Ecuadorian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,872,719 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,738,990 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 1.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Ecuadorian |
| Minimum | 0.61% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 16.2% | 10.7% |
| Range | 15.6% | 8.8% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 5.6% |
| Median | 5.9% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana and Ecuadorians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Oceania (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Moroccan (6.1%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |