Immigrants from Lithuania vs Italian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Italian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Italians
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
22.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Italian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,713,012 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,457,060 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 10.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Italian |
Minimum | 3.6% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 9.5% | 31.5% |
Range | 5.9% | 29.8% |
Mean | 5.6% | 6.7% |
Median | 5.6% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 6.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Belgium (5.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Brazil (5.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Italians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |