Immigrants from Chile vs New Zealander Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
New Zealander
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
New Zealanders
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
21.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs New Zealander Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,627,878 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,922,503 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 17.4%, a difference of 2.7%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | New Zealander |
Minimum | 6.5% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 37.6% |
Range | 16.5% | 34.5% |
Mean | 14.1% | 15.6% |
Median | 14.6% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Jordan (17.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (17.0%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (17.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Lebanese (17.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Israeli (17.0%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Nicaraguans | 93.0 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Lebanese | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Israelis | 91.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.9 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Welsh | 90.8 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 17.0% |
French | 90.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 17.0% |
Chileans | 89.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 17.0% |
Aleuts | 89.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (17.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Delaware (17.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Haiti (17.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | France | 29.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 29.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 27.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 27.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 27.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 17.4% |
Delaware | 25.6 /100 | #193 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 22.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 17.4% |
New Zealanders | 21.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.4% |
Guyanese | 17.5 /100 | #196 | Poor 17.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 16.7 /100 | #197 | Poor 17.5% |
Immigrants | Panama | 14.8 /100 | #198 | Poor 17.5% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 14.3 /100 | #199 | Poor 17.5% |
Haitians | 14.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 17.5% |
South American Indians | 13.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.5% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 12.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.5% |