Immigrants from Chile vs South African Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
South African
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
South Africans
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs South African Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,627,878 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,593,753 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 0.48%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | South African |
Minimum | 6.5% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 19.8% |
Range | 16.5% | 17.3% |
Mean | 14.1% | 12.8% |
Median | 14.6% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 15.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and South Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Jordan (17.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (17.0%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (17.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Lebanese (17.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Israeli (17.0%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Scottish (16.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from China (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Japan (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Denmark (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Nicaraguans | 93.0 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Lebanese | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Israelis | 91.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 17.0% |