Immigrants from Chile vs New Zealander Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
New Zealander
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
New Zealanders
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs New Zealander Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,580,502 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,891,715 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.13%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 0.64% | 0.22% |
| Maximum | 6.4% | 6.6% |
| Range | 5.8% | 6.4% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.2% |
| Median | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and New Zealanders by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Sudanese (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Peru (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Syrian (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Venezuelan (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
| New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Czechs | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 86.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Arabs | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 84.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.1% |