Luxembourger vs New Zealander Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Luxembourger
New Zealander
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Luxembourgers
New Zealanders
16.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
21.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs New Zealander Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,680,571 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.425 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,922,503 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 17.4%, a difference of 6.5%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | New Zealander |
Minimum | 1.6% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 20.8% | 37.6% |
Range | 19.3% | 34.5% |
Mean | 12.9% | 15.6% |
Median | 13.4% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Croatia (16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (16.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Pakistan (16.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Polish (16.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Croatian (16.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Poles | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (17.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Delaware (17.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Haiti (17.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | France | 29.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 29.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 27.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 27.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 27.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 17.4% |
Delaware | 25.6 /100 | #193 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 22.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 17.4% |
New Zealanders | 21.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.4% |
Guyanese | 17.5 /100 | #196 | Poor 17.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 16.7 /100 | #197 | Poor 17.5% |
Immigrants | Panama | 14.8 /100 | #198 | Poor 17.5% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 14.3 /100 | #199 | Poor 17.5% |
Haitians | 14.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 17.5% |
South American Indians | 13.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.5% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 12.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.5% |