Immigrants from Brazil vs Palestinian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Palestinian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Palestinians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Palestinian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,924,003 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,454,064 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 0.070% | 0.070% |
| Maximum | 9.7% | 6.8% |
| Range | 9.7% | 6.7% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 3.0% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 0.93% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil and Palestinians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |