Immigrants from Brazil vs Palestinian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Palestinian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Palestinians
11.7%
POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Palestinian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,843,961 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Palestinian |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 27.4% | 25.3% |
Range | 25.1% | 25.0% |
Mean | 11.3% | 10.8% |
Median | 10.7% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil and Palestinians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Puget Sound Salish (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |