Immigrants from Brazil vs Kenyan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Kenyan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Kenyans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Kenyan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,924,003 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,202,963 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 1.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Kenyan |
| Minimum | 0.070% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 9.7% | 7.0% |
| Range | 9.7% | 5.6% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 3.2% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil and Kenyans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |