Immigrants from Brazil vs Zimbabwean Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Zimbabwean
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Zimbabweans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Zimbabwean Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,924,003 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 1.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 0.070% | 0.53% |
Maximum | 9.7% | 6.9% |
Range | 9.7% | 6.4% |
Mean | 3.1% | 3.0% |
Median | 2.9% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 3.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil and Zimbabweans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |