Immigrants from Oceania vs South American Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
South American Indian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
South American Indians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
45.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs South American Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,325,142 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,973 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.78%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | South American Indian |
Minimum | 0.72% | 0.64% |
Maximum | 20.2% | 7.1% |
Range | 19.5% | 6.4% |
Mean | 3.5% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.3% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and South American Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Slavic (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Swiss (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Brazilian (2.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |