Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs South American Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
South American Indian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
South American Indians
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
69.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs South American Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,731,595 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,973 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.87%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | South American Indian |
Minimum | 0.099% | 0.64% |
Maximum | 4.6% | 7.1% |
Range | 4.5% | 6.4% |
Mean | 1.9% | 2.4% |
Median | 1.9% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.77% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.80% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.79% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and South American Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are South African (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Serbian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Austrian (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Pakistani (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Iraqi (2.1%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Swiss (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Brazilian (2.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | South America | 73.8 /100 | #153 | Good 2.1% |
Slovenes | 73.6 /100 | #154 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 2.1% |
Pakistanis | 71.6 /100 | #156 | Good 2.1% |
Serbians | 70.2 /100 | #157 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 69.9 /100 | #158 | Good 2.1% |
South Africans | 69.8 /100 | #159 | Good 2.1% |
Austrians | 69.0 /100 | #160 | Good 2.1% |
Iraqis | 67.7 /100 | #161 | Good 2.1% |
Hungarians | 67.4 /100 | #162 | Good 2.1% |
Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |