Icelander vs Immigrants from Netherlands Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Icelander
Immigrants from Netherlands
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Icelanders
Immigrants from Netherlands
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Immigrants from Netherlands Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,642,692 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,838,654 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | Immigrants from Netherlands |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 16.5% | 16.5% |
| Range | 16.1% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 6.3% |
| Median | 5.6% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Immigrants from Netherlands by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Netherlands are Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |