Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Central American Indians
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
69.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,061,009 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,316,169 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 10.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
Minimum | 0.88% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 15.5% | 4.4% |
Range | 14.6% | 2.7% |
Mean | 4.7% | 3.0% |
Median | 3.6% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 3.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 0.60% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 0.56% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 0.56% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Estonian (3.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (3.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Serbian (3.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Ukrainian (3.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and Luxembourger (3.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 3.3% |
Serbians | 2.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Austria | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 3.3% |
German Russians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.3% |
Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.3% |
Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |