Central American Indian vs Russian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Russian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Central American Indians
Russians
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
7.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Russian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,061,009 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,868,935 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 2.6%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian | Russian |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 0.73% |
| Maximum | 15.5% | 18.2% |
| Range | 14.6% | 17.5% |
| Mean | 4.7% | 5.2% |
| Median | 3.6% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians and Russians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Estonian (3.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (3.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Ukrainian (3.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Luxembourger (3.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and Greek (3.2%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.080%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 3.3% |