Australian vs Immigrants from Netherlands Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Australian
Immigrants from Netherlands
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Australians
Immigrants from Netherlands
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Immigrants from Netherlands Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,838,654 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Immigrants from Netherlands |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 16.5% |
| Range | 13.3% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 6.3% |
| Median | 6.1% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Immigrants from Netherlands by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Denmark (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Netherlands are Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |