Australian vs Immigrants from South Africa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Australian
Immigrants from South Africa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Australians
Immigrants from South Africa
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Immigrants from South Africa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,268,950 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.763 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.88%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Immigrants from South Africa |
Minimum | 2.5% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 15.8% | 27.3% |
Range | 13.3% | 26.8% |
Mean | 6.9% | 7.8% |
Median | 6.1% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Immigrants from South Africa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (5.7%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |