Australian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Australian
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Australians
Immigrants from Northern Africa
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,147,957 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.94%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 2.5% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 15.8% | 12.9% |
Range | 13.3% | 10.4% |
Mean | 6.9% | 6.0% |
Median | 6.1% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 6.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Immigrants from Northern Africa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |