Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Immigrants from Micronesia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Immigrants from Micronesia
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,929,703 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 31.6 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $80,544, a difference of 13.7%), per capita income ($41,958 compared to $37,464, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $61,000, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($95,114 compared to $90,345, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $50,691, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $87,864, a difference of 6.7%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Tragic $37,464 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Tragic $90,345 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Tragic $75,574 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Tragic $41,133 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Tragic $47,177 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Tragic $35,477 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Tragic $50,691 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Tragic $80,544 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Tragic $87,864 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Average $61,000 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.80%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 15.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 18.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 23.0% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 31.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 36.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Poor 5.6% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 28.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Exceptional 77.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 83.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 81.1% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 7.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.11%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Average 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Fair 27.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Tragic 44.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Tragic 45.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Poor 32.9% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 125.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 69.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 15.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 31.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 47.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Fair 55.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 20.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.3%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 30.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 0.84%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.97%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 61.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Tragic 54.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 40.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.0%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.9%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 50.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |