Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,906,095 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $60,217, a difference of 9.6%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $50,645, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $91,337, a difference of 0.26%), per capita income ($41,958 compared to $42,289, a difference of 0.79%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $38,810, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 29.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.0%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 23.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.42%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.5%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 139.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 54.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 16.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 34.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 45.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.9%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 23.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.050%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.9%).