Macedonian vs Swiss No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Macedonian
Swiss
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Macedonians
Swiss
12.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Swiss No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,434,178 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.420 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,788,069 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 54.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Macedonian | Swiss |
Minimum | 0.82% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 24.5% | 65.0% |
Range | 23.7% | 62.2% |
Mean | 7.5% | 14.0% |
Median | 6.0% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 15.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Macedonians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Subsaharan African (12.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Liberia (12.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.1%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and South American Indian (12.1%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Egyptians | 1.4 /100 | #253 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 1.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 11.9% |
Hondurans | 1.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.0% |
Liberians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.0% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.3% |
Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
Israelis | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Cherokee | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |