Macedonian vs Central American No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Macedonian
Central American
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Macedonians
Central Americans
12.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
24.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Central American No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,434,178 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.420 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,389,156 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 12.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Macedonian | Central American |
| Minimum | 0.82% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 24.5% | 33.8% |
| Range | 23.7% | 32.6% |
| Mean | 7.5% | 11.8% |
| Median | 6.0% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Macedonians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Subsaharan African (12.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Liberia (12.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.1%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and South American Indian (12.1%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Egyptians | 1.4 /100 | #253 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 1.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Hondurans | 1.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Liberians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Israelis | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Shoshone (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Pueblo (10.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 36.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 34.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 33.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 10.7% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 32.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 10.7% |
| Ukrainians | 28.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 10.7% |
| Pueblo | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 26.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 10.8% |
| Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
| Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
| Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
| Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |